Send Message
Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.
In most OEM projects, material selection doesn’t really start as a theoretical discussion. It usually comes up when a product already has a prototype, and something doesn’t feel right in testing—maybe the part ages too fast, or it simply doesn’t hold up in field use. Between silicone and rubber, both are used a lot in industrial components. At WJM, we see this comparison almost every week, especially in protective cases, device housings, and functional covers for handheld equipment.
Rubber performs well in basic mechanical stress. That’s not really in question. The issue shows up when the product is exposed to heat, sunlight, or long-term outdoor use.
In a few projects we handled for handheld devices, rubber parts started showing surface hardening after a period of use. Not immediately, but gradually.
Silicone behaves differently. It’s not that it’s “stronger” in every sense, but it tends to stay more stable over time, especially under temperature changes.
For things like industrial handheld device accessories, that stability usually matters more than initial mechanical strength.
From a manufacturing point of view, rubber and silicone don’t behave the same way in molding.
Rubber curing tends to require tighter process control. Small changes in temperature or timing can lead to variation between batches.
Silicone is generally more forgiving, especially in compression molding processes. We’ve seen more consistent output when production volumes go up.
That’s one of the reasons silicone compression molding is widely used in protective components where dimensional stability matters.
Rubber is usually cheaper at the material level. That’s often the first reason customers lean toward it.
But in real projects, especially when products are deployed in the field, the conversation usually shifts later.
If a part needs to be replaced more often, or if failure leads to device downtime, the overall cost goes up quickly.
So in many cases, silicone ends up being more stable from a lifecycle cost point of view, especially in larger programs like custom silicone protective case projects.
We don’t treat silicone as a “better material” in every situation. It really depends on use case.
Rubber still makes sense in low-frequency or cost-sensitive applications.
But for handheld devices—barcode scanners, PDA terminals, POS equipment—we usually see silicone being more suitable.
Not because of marketing reasons, but because of how these devices are actually used in the field.
For example, in barcode scanner silicone cover applications, grip, shock absorption, and long-term shape stability tend to matter more than raw hardness.
One thing we often notice is that material is discussed first, but structure is actually more important.
Even a good material can fail if the mold design is not aligned with the device structure.
That’s why at WJM, material selection is usually discussed together with tooling and geometry—not separately.
In OEM silicone parts manufacturer projects, this integration step often decides whether the final product fits properly or needs redesign later.
In actual production runs, consistency is usually the biggest concern.
It’s not about whether a sample looks good. It’s about whether the 10,000th piece still behaves the same way as the first one.
That’s where process control becomes more important than material choice alone.
For higher-volume projects, especially in custom molded silicone parts, small variations in curing or molding conditions can become noticeable in the field.
Silicone vs rubber is not really a “which is better” question.
It’s more about what kind of environment the product will live in, how often it will be used, and what level of failure is acceptable.
In industrial applications, especially for handheld devices and protective components, silicone tends to be the more stable option over time.But the real decision usually comes from testing, not theory.
If you are working on industrial device protection, OEM silicone components, or custom molded parts, WJM can support from design to mass production.
📩 sales@wjsilicone.com
In industrial handheld device ecosystems, protection is often treated as an accessory decision. In reality, it is part of the system reliability architecture. Devices such as barcode scanne
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) has reaffirmed its long-standing ban on the import and sale of electronic smoking devices (ESDs), including e-cigarettes and vapes, which has been in
In industrial field environments, handheld barcode scanners, PDA terminals, and various data collection devices are subjected to high-frequency usage on a daily basis. Frequent drops, abrasion, exp
In recent years, the way POS devices are used has changed significantly. Across industries such as retail, food service, and mobile payment, POS terminals are now exposed to much higher usage frequ
Email to this supplier
Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.
Fill in more information so that we can get in touch with you faster
Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.